Museum discovers a twin of the 'Mona Lisa'

A "Mona Lisa" copy owned by Spain's Prado Museum was almost certainly painted by one of Leonardo da Vinci's apprentices alongside the master himself as he did the original, museum officials said Wednesday.

The stunning find of what the Prado now says is probably the earliest known copy of La Gioconda will give art lovers and experts an idea of what the "Mona Lisa" looked like back in the 16th century, said Gabriele Finaldi, the museum's deputy director collections.

"It is as if we were in the same studio, standing at the next easel," he told reporters.

The copy has been part of the Prado collection for years and displayed occasionally but no one paid much attention to it because around the woman in the "Mona Lisa" was a stark black background, not the pretty landscape seen in the original.

Two years ago, to get the copy ready for a da Vinci exhibit later this year in Paris, where the original hangs in the Louvre, tests were done and this gave restorers a hint that something lie under the black coat, which was added in the 18th century for reasons not fully understood.

When the black covering was removed, a Tuscan landscape very similar to the one in the original emerged.

And X-ray tests which allow experts to peek under a painting's surface to see how it developed as it was composed showed that changes made in the copy were similar to changes made to the original as it evolved.

Varnish has also been removed from the Mona Lisa's face, making it look brighter and younger than the face coated with cracked, darkish varnish at the Paris museum.

"You can imagine that this is what the 'Mona Lisa' looked like back in the 16th century," Finaldi said.

Miguel Falomir, the Prado's director for Italian painting, said the copy gives art lovers and experts a chance "to admire the 'Mona Lisa' with totally different eyes."

He and Finaldi said the museum's best guess is that the copy was done by a da Vinci apprentice named Francesco Melzi, because of the style observed in it.

Besides the black background, one other difference from the original is the woman in the copy has eyebrows and the Mona Lisa in the real masterpiece does not.

There are dozens of the surviving replicas of the masterpiece from the 16th and 17th centuries.

The Louvre supports the Prado's new evaluation of the painting, Finaldi said.

The Prado plans to put it on display later this month before it travels to France for the da Vinci show.

Related content:

Discuss this post

Another case of an expert pretending he knows something that is impossible to ascertain with any certainty.

My guess is it was painted soon after the original, not alongside, but who knows, and who cares!

    Reply#1 - Fri Feb 3, 2012 9:27 AM EST

    Maybe Leonardo was teaching a Bob Ross class?

      #1.1 - Fri Feb 3, 2012 2:26 PM EST
      Reply

      Still not a "pretty" woman by 21st century standards.... (I know shallow aint I)

        Reply#2 - Fri Feb 3, 2012 10:14 AM EST

        Looks like she had a nice rack, though...

          #2.1 - Fri Feb 3, 2012 12:28 PM EST

          That is an excellent point! and with that in mind, ask yourself 'why were so many copies made during the time period? Did the other copies attempt to emulate Leonardo's expertise? answer: no. Was the subject of the painting the real importance or the skill alone the importance?

          If she is was indeed the silk merchant's wife, why is there no record of the Gherardini family ever filing a lawsuit to claim rightful ownership. If it is really Leonardo in drag, or Salai in drag why did the French King insist upon having such a rediculous painting. Surely the French King would have known Leonardo's face, and Salai's face. He never made such a conclusion of the painting? The art historians have only begun these silly assumption since the 19th century?

          The colors in her garments prove that she is a member of the powerful Italian Sforza-Visconti dynasty. Leonardo was hired as a court painter to paint the members of the Royal Milanese family for over 17 years. The long veil she is wearing is worn ONLY and specifically by the Milanese duchesses in mourning. There were only 4 Duchesses of the Argonese house before the French overthrew the Milanese. Three of them were blond. Her identity is without dispute: Isabella of Aragon, Duchess of Milan and Bari, daughter of King Alfonso II, and widow of Gian Galeazzo II Maria Sforza.

          For more information with 100's of historical proofs see www.Kleio.org - in English and German

            #2.2 - Tue Feb 21, 2012 1:13 AM EST
            Reply

            Finally the Prado copy is getting its overdue recognition. For those who think this is a fake, please google it under 'Prado Mona Lisa' images. It has long been listed in wikipedia, flickr, and in books. It puzzles me that the museum claims to have recently discovered it.

            This painting bring us one step closer to accepting her true identity. She is wearing the colors of the powerful Sforza-Visconti dynasty, red, white and black, as told to us by brilliant (though not yet properly recognized) historian, Maike Vogt-Luerssen. To learn more of who she was and why the Louvre painting is not the original but was Leonardo's own personal copy - please see www.kleio.org

            Be prepared to be very shocked to learn that DaVinci's closest friends left a visual record of her life and signifigance to Leonarodo in their paintings in spite of a forced secrecy. Also see: facebook: the true mona Lisa

            Mrs. Luerssen's research is truly going to change the way history is written. Will you be convinced that the mystery is now solved?

            • 1 vote
            Reply#3 - Fri Feb 3, 2012 2:14 PM EST
            You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
            As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.